← Explore Capabilities
Evaluate claims
Ability for participants to evaluate claims made during the process by any actor or source.
How this is performed now...
- Citizens' assembly organizers Citizens’ assemblies organizers do not currently systematically evaluate claims. Participants are often provided with critical thinking training and the ability to ask questions of experts, stakeholders and commissioning authorities. A common practice is to take questions from participants at the end of a meeting and provide answers before the next meeting.
- Process organizers Process organisers seek to provide diverse information sources and support participant reasoning with training for careful prompting.
Related Resources
Product
Cofacts
Taiwan’s Cofacts, a fact-checking platform built through civic collaboration.
Product
Community Notes
X's (formerly Twitter's) Community Notes is a crowdsourced fact-checking feature where users can add context to potentially misleading posts, with notes appearing when rated helpful by contributors from diverse perspectives.
Research
Birdwatch: Crowd Wisdom and Bridging Algorithms can Inform Understanding and Reduce the Spread of Misinformation
Research examining how crowdsourced annotations combined with algorithmic selection can combat misinformation, developing a matrix-factorization algorithm identifying annotations that appeal broadly across heterogeneous user groups through bridging-based ranking. Results showed algorithmically-se...
Research
Supernotes: Driving Consensus in Crowd-Sourced Fact-Checking
AI-driven approach to improve X's Community Notes where for 91% of posts with proposed notes, no notes achieve sufficient support. The system generates LLM-created fact-checking notes synthesizing information from multiple existing notes, with a scoring model identifying candidates most likely to...
Related Product gaps
There are no related product gaps at the moment.